What Place Does Patriotism Have in Schools?
On August 17, Courageous Conversations About Our Schools and Braver Angels hosted a national conversation about patriotism, public education, civic responsibility, honest history, and the challenge of discussing difficult issues across differences.
EVENT SPONSORS
Event Overview
Why This Conversation Matters
Patriotism is one of those terms that seems pretty simple until you start talking about it.
Today, there is a national conversation unfolding about whether schools should help shape students' sense of patriotism. In February 2025, members of Congress introduced the Promoting American Patriotism in Our Schools Act, legislation that would require federally funded schools to display the American flag, recite the Pledge of Allegiance, and provide instruction about the flag's history and significance.
Supporters argue that schools should help cultivate civic responsibility, national unity, and love of country. At the same time, the word patriotism can mean very different things to different people, ranging from civic responsibility and democratic commitment to concerns about nationalism and unquestioning loyalty.
Others are raising additional concerns, asking whether efforts to teach patriotism risk becoming a form of indoctrination or crowding out honest discussions about the full story of our nation.
“Love of country must spring from willing hearts and free minds.”
These disagreements are not just happening in Washington. They are playing out in local communities, including schools, school boards, and dinner tables. How should teachers discuss political protest, civic dissent, controversial historical events, or moments of national division? As acts of patriotism, threats to democracy, or something more complicated?
Too often, these conversations leave us more divided than when we started. So for this event, we slowed things down. We brought together a small group of Americans with different perspectives and backgrounds, not to win an argument, but to understand one another a little better.
Panelists and Hosts
The conversation brought together a dynamic cross section of speakers with different generations, communities, professional backgrounds, and lived experiences.
Clarissa Coleman
Student, Howard University, Washington, D.C.
Contributed a youth civic leadership perspective shaped by student advocacy and public engagement.
Mike Walsh
School Board Trustee, Oroville, California
Contributed experience in public education governance, leadership development, and student-centered problem solving.
Richard Kahlenberg
Director of the American Identity Project, Washington, D.C.
Contributed a public policy perspective on American identity, civic belonging, and democratic ideals.
Michael Balena
Barber, Folsom, California
Contributed a working-class perspective shaped by everyday conversations with people across different backgrounds.
Emma Humphreys
Civics Educator, St. Simons Island, Georgia
Contributed expertise in civic education and how students learn democratic habits and practices.
Paul Carrese
Director of the Center for American Civics at Arizona State University
Contributed scholarship on civic education, constitutional principles, and reflective patriotism.
Ellen Tucker
Writer, Teaching American History, Monterey, California
Contributed experience supporting secondary history and government teachers.
Sue Lani Madsen
Rancher, Eastern Washington
Contributed a rural perspective rooted in ranching, agriculture, family, and community life.
Maury Giles
CEO, Braver Angels
Contributed opening reflections on courageous citizenship and disagreement across difference.
Ken Futernick
Podcast host, Courageous Conversations About Our Schools
Contributed the education framing and central questions for the discussion.
Mary Thomas-Vallens
Director, Braver Angels
Contributed facilitation and helped guide the conversation in the spirit of Braver Angels dialogue.
How the Conversation Was Framed
The event was designed as a conversation, not a debate. Panelists were invited to speak honestly, listen carefully, and explore disagreement without reducing one another to political labels.
Conversation Overview
Participants explored what patriotism means, how it differs from nationalism, whether schools should help students develop civic belonging, and how educators can approach difficult topics without turning civic education into indoctrination.
The Braver Way
- Speak openly and honestly, without fear.
- Treat people who disagree with dignity and respect.
- Stay curious about views different from your own.
- Avoid exaggerating or stereotyping the other side.
- Look for common ground where it exists.
- Remember that everyone has blind spots.
- Enter disagreement as a chance for both sides to learn.
By the Numbers & What We Heard
Notable Themes
- Participants wanted space for civil dialogue across political and cultural differences.
- Patriotism means different things to different Americans, from national family to shared ideals to service and civic responsibility.
- Panelists returned often to the difference between patriotism and nationalism.
- The conversation emphasized honest history, civic trust, disagreement, and the danger of avoiding difficult questions.
- Participants wrestled with how schools can teach civic knowledge without telling students what to think.
- A shared theme emerged: love of country can include criticism, argument, reflection, and the desire to make the country better.
What Viewers Took Away
Viewer responses pointed to both appreciation for the conversation and ideas for future events, including more audience participation, more time for questions, and more concrete ways to take action locally.
Feedback Themes
- Common ground: Many viewers noticed significant agreement among panelists, especially around constructive patriotism, critical thinking, and the desire to improve the country.
- Civic education: Attendees emphasized the importance of open-ended, experiential civic learning that helps students think for themselves.
- Defining patriotism:Viewers appreciated the distinction between patriotism and nationalism, and the recognition that the word carries different meanings for different people.
- Community action:Several responses called for adults to model healthy debate, engage local school boards, and continue the dialogue in their own communities.
“We have so much more in common than what divides us. Let’s be brave and go forward!”
“Much admiration for the panel of speakers, and the organizers of the event for the diversity on the panel and the excellent questions.”
“We agreed on several ideas: that patriotism is constructive, that educating students to think for themselves is important, and that civic education is critical.”
“How one could take action based on the discussions.”

